SFI Factsheets, Reports, and Other Resources

Brochures

Factsheets

  • Loopholes in the SFI.”  Factsheet summarizing gaps and other problems with the SFI’s standards and policies.  October, 2006.  

Reports and Articles

SFI Certified Companies’ Destructive Practices

Logging Old Growth Forests

Logging de facto Wilderness Areas

Harming Imperiled Fish, Wildlife, and Plants

Water Quality Impacts

  • “Effects of Wood Chip Mills on North Carolina’s Aquatic Communities.”  Cites studies showing that found BMPs inadequate to protect water resources.  Schaberg, R, Working Paper No. 11, for Economic and Ecological Impacts Associated with Wood Chip Production in North Carolina, Duke University, July 12, 2002.  

Illegal Logging

Conversion of Natural Forests to Plantations

Conversion of Forests to Sprawl and Non-Forest Conditions

Excessive Clearcutting

Excessive Chemical Use

Unsustainable Logging Levels

Impacts on Communities, Workers, and Indigenous People

Company Case Studies

Regional Case Studies

  • Bringing Down the Boreal.” Examines the SFI and CSA in the context of Boreal forest protection issues.   ForestEthics, August, 2004.  
Fully independent and not overly influenced by timber industry. FSC:YES SFI:NO
Strong forest and environmental protection standards. FSC:YES SFI:NO
Strong community protection standards. FSC:YES SFI:NO
Product content monitoring (chain of custody) consistently required. FSC:YES SFI:NO
Consistent link between product labels/claims and certified forests. FSC:YES SFI:NO
Strong certification and accreditation process. FSC:YES SFI:NO
Transparency and public participation consistently required. FSC:YES SFI:NO
Certifies some of the most environmentally destructive timber companies in North America. FSC:NO SFI:YES

Certification System Characteristics

more comparisons